Bioinspired, size-tunable self-assembly of polymer-lipid bilayer nanodiscs (2024)

Abstract

Polymer-based nanodiscs are valuable tools in biomedical research that can offer a detergent-free solubilization of membrane proteins maintaining their native lipid environment. Here, we introduce a novel ~1.6 kDa SMA-based polymer with styrene:maleic acid moieties that can form nanodiscs containing a planar lipid bilayer which are useful to reconstitute membrane proteins for structural and functional studies. The physicochemical properties and the mechanism of formation of polymer-based nanodiscs are characterized by light scattering, NMR, FT-IR, and TEM imaging experiments. A remarkable feature is that nanodiscs of different sizes, from nanometer to sub micrometer diameter, can be produced only by varying the lipid-to-polymer ratio. As demonstrated, the small size nanodiscs (up to ~30 nm diameter) can be used for solution NMR studies whereas the magnetic-alignment of macro-nanodiscs (diameter of >~40 nm) can be exploited for solid-state NMR studies on membrane proteins.

Keywords: Nanodiscs, Lipid, Polymer, NMR, Membrane proteins

Graphical Abstract

Lipid bilayer nanodiscs of different size are formed by using modified Styrene maleic acid co-polymer. The small size nanodiscs (up to ~30 nm diameter) can be used for solution NMR studies whereas the magnetic-alignment of large size nanodiscs (or macro-nanodiscs with a diameter of >~40 nm) can be exploited for solid-state NMR studies on membrane proteins.

Bioinspired, size-tunable self-assembly of polymer-lipid bilayer nanodiscs (1)

The search for membrane mimetic soft nanomaterials that provide native environment for structural and functional studies of membrane proteins has been a formidable challenge[13]. A breakthrough was provided by nanodiscs, which were inspired from a High Density Lipo-protein (HDL)[35]. Nanodiscs are disc-shaped patches of lipid bilayers surrounded by an amphiphilic belt and represent an excellent model system offering a great stability and control of oligomeric states of the reconstituted membrane protein[6]. Nanodisc technology can be used for isolation, purification, structural and functional characterization of membrane proteins, and is increasingly utilized [3]. The amphiphilic belt is critical for the stability and function of nanodiscs. Studies have reported different types of surrounding belts including Membrane Scaffold proteins (MSPs)[5, 7], peptides[8], and polymer[9]. Even though MSP-based nanodiscs are excellent mimics of the membrane, the reconstitution of a membrane protein still requires the undesirable use of detergents[10], and therefore detergent-free solubilization of membrane proteins attracted new attention in the field[11, 12].

Recently reported studies have shown that hydrolyzed Styrene:Maleic Acid (SMA) copolymer can be used to form nanodiscs and to extract membrane proteins directly from the cell membrane[11]. Although successful and increasingly utilized for structural studies on membrane proteins, the narrow range of nanodisc size[13] (typically 8 to 15 nm) that can be prepared using SMA is a major limitation for studies on large size proteins or protein-protein complexes. The high expense associated with the large quantity of SMA-based nanodiscs that is needed for biological applications is also a limitation, while there is a need to enhance the tolerance to acidic pH and divalent metal ions [14]. In this study, we introduce more versatile polymer-based nanodiscs to overcome the limitations of previously reported nanodiscs. Synthesis and characterization of a low molecular weight copolymer, amine modified Styrene:Maleic acid denoted as SMA-EA, and its application to study membrane proteins using solution and solid-state NMR experiments are reported. The ability of SMA-EA copolymer to form defined size nanodiscs, that can easily be controlled by the lipid:polymer ratio, is well demonstrated using Static Light Scattering (SLS), Dynamic Light Scattering (DLS), Size-Exclusion Chromatography (SEC), Fourier-Transform InfraRed Spectroscopy (FT-IR), solid-state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (ssNMR), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), and fluorescence experiments. Most importantly, we show that SMA-EA polymers can form large size nanodiscs (called “macro-nanodiscs”) that can spontaneously align in the presence of an external magnetic field and the direction of alignment can be altered using a paramagnetic salt. These nanodiscs and macro-nanodiscs can be used to study atomic-resolution structure and dynamics of membrane proteins.

A commercially available, less expensive, low molecular weight (Mn ~1.6 kDa) ~1.3:1 Styrene:Maleic Anhydride copolymer was used as a starting material. Our experiments proved that this SMA copolymer by itself cannot be used to prepare nanodiscs (data shown in Supporting Information, Figure S1). To overcome this limitation, we developed a simple two-step synthetic approach to modify the SMA polymer as shown in Figure 1A. First, the SMA polymer was reacted with 2-aminoethanol in the presence of N,N-trimethylamine, and then followed by the hydrolysis of any unreacted maleic anhydride. Other details on the production of the final product, SMA-EA polymer, are given in the Supporting Information.

Figure 1. Synthesis and characterization of SMA-EA polymer.

Open in a new tab

The newly synthesized ~2 kDa SMA-EA polymer was characterized by FT-IR (Figure 1B) experiments. The appearance of a characteristic broad band centered around 3300 cm−1 in the 3000–3600 cm−1 region of the FT-IR spectrum confirms the formation of SMA-EA polymer; this corresponds to a combination of stretching bands of -OH in the carboxylic and alcoholic groups of SMA-EA. In addition, the formation of amides and complete opening of the anhydride ring of SMA to result in the SMA-EA polymer are indicated by the shift of the 1772 cm−1 band observed for SMA to a lower wavenumber 1688 cm−1 for SMA-EA.

The SMA-EA polymer was further characterized by 13C Cross-Polarization Magic Angle Spinning (CP-MAS) solid-state NMR spectroscopy. By comparing the spectra of SMA-EA and the parent compound SMA (Figure 1C), we were able to assign peaks at 41 and 60 ppm to aliphatic carbons and peaks observed at 128 ppm to aromatic carbons. The peak observed at 172.4 ppm, assigned to the carbonyl carbon of maleic anhydride in SMA, is shifted to lower field by 5.7 ppm in the spectrum of SMA-EA suggesting the formation of amides in SMA-EA.

To test the SMA-EA efficacy in solubilizing lipids to form nanodiscs, a solution of the polymer was added to MLVs (multilamellar vesicles) of DMPC (1:3 w/w % DMPC: SMA-EA). SMA-EA spontaneously turned the initial cloudy DMPC vesicle solution into a clear transparent solution, indicating the formation of smaller size particles when compared to MLVs of DMPC (Figure 2A). A substantial decrease in the light scattering intensity over time observed after the addition of SMA-EA polymer to DMPC MLVs suggests that SMA-EA can break large MLVs to form smaller size lipid aggregates. The solubilization of DMPC MLVs into nanodiscs was further characterized by 31P NMR experiments (Figure 2B). The appearance of an isotropic 31P peak (~ −2 ppm) upon the addition of SMA-EA to DMPC MLVs and the increase in the peak intensity with the concentration of SMA-EA suggest the formation of a nanodisc containing a DMPC lipid bilayer that can tumble fast to result in a 31P peak at the isotropic chemical shift frequency (Figure 2B and C). A similar trend was observed by total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. DMPC vesicles containing 1 mol % of rhodamine-functionalized DMPE were visualized with TIRF as a function of time right after the addition of SMA-EA to DMPC MLVs. As shown in Figure 2D (and in the video in the Supporting Information, Figure S2), the large size MLVs observed before the addition of SMA-EA disappear as the polymer solubilize the vesicles to form small size lipid nanodiscs as observed by a progressive disappearance of the fluorescent signal.

Figure 2. Formation of SMA-EA polymer based nanodiscs.

Open in a new tab

Dynamic light scattering profiles of nanodiscs at different polymer-to-lipid ratios showed a size distribution profile, indicating that the SMA-EA polymer is able to form stable nanodiscs of different sizes. This result was also confirmed by TEM images (Figure 3B and C).

Figure 3. Characterization of SMA-EA polymer based macro and nanodiscs of DMPC bilayers.

Open in a new tab

The interaction between the polymer and lipids in the nanodisc is revealed by the 2D 1H/1H NOESY spectrum (Figures 3D). The cross peaks observed between styrene protons and the DMPC acyl chain’s CH2 protons indicate the interaction between the SMA-EA polymer and DMPC lipid bilayer and suggest a structural model in which the styrene rings are closely located in the hydrophobic core of the DMPC lipid bilayer. The DMPC lipid bilayer within the polymer-based nanodiscs was further investigated using FT-IR experiments. The characteristic sharp peak observed in an FT-IR spectrum due to the CH stretching frequency of DMPC is a good indicator of lipid acyl chains packing in a bilayer. The FT-IR spectra of lyophilized samples of DMPC MLVs and nanodiscs showed no difference in the CH stretching frequencies suggesting a type of lipid packing inside the nanodisc similar to that in liposomes (Figure 3E and see the Supporting Information Figure S3).

One of the disadvantages of SMA polymer nanodiscs is that they tend to precipitate under low pH (<6) [16], which could affect several biochemical protein assays. The stability of SMA-EA nanodiscs under different pH was examined by SLS experiments (See the Supporting Information Figure S5). The results indicate that these nanodiscs are stable under acidic pH up to pH~3.3. Therefore, the SMA-EA polymer based nanodiscs are more tolerant to acidic pH than previously reported polymers. This enhanced stability of SMA-EA nanodiscs is attributed to the reduced number of carboxylic groups when compared to that in the SMA polymer. The nanodisc shows superior stability towards salt (Figure S4) and temperature (Figure S5), and a similar trend was observed in the presence of divalent metal ions (See the Supporting Information Figures S6 and S7).

We then characterized the SMA-EA polymer DMPC nanodiscs (~10 nm in diameter) and macro-nanodiscs (~50 nm in diameter) using NMR experiments. 31P (Figure 4A–C) and 14N (Figure 4D–F) NMR spectra exhibited an isotropic peak (−2.9 ppm) for nanodiscs (Figure 4A, 4D) while anisotropic peak patterns (Figure 4B, 4E) were observed for macro-nanodiscs indicating their alignment in the presence of an external magnetic field[17, 18] (also see Figures S8 and S9). The observation of a peak at −17.9 ppm in the 31P spectrum (Figure 4B) and ~8 kHz 14N quadrupole splitting (Figure 4E) suggest that the lipid bilayer normal is oriented perpendicular to the external magnetic field direction. On the other hand, the use of Yb3+ ions flipped the orientation of macro-nanodiscs in such a way the bilayer normal became parallel to the magnetic field direction in similar manner to bicelles [19] and therefore the 31P peak appeared at ~20 ppm (Figure 4C) and the 14N quadrupole coupling splitting increased by a factor of 2 to become ~16 kHz (Figure 4F); this change is according to the second-order polynomial, ½(3cos2 −1), in the quadrupole coupling Hamiltonian, where θ is the angle between the lipid bilayer normal and the magnetic field direction. Since the macro-nanodiscs are smaller than MLVs, the motionally-averaged 31P chemical shift anisotropy span should be smaller (unaligned 31P lineshape is shown in Figure S8); in addition, the added lanthanide ions can affect the chemical shift values.[19] The ability to control the extent of flip of macro-nanodiscs is also demonstrated by recording 31P spectra for various concentrations of Yb3+ (Figure 4I). The magnetic-alignment properties of lipid bilayers in macro-nanodiscs are similar to that has been reported for bicelles.[18, 20] To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study demonstrating the magnetic-alignment of lipid macro-nanodiscs.

Figure 4. Magnetic-alignment of SMA-EA polymer based macro-nanodiscs.

Open in a new tab

It is remarkable that polymer-based macro-nanodiscs can be aligned in a magnetic field. Such aligned macro-nanodiscs enable the applications of well-established solid-state NMR experiments that have been used to obtain atomic-resolution images of membrane proteins in fluid lamellar phase lipid bilayers by measuring anisotropic NMR parameters such as chemical shift, heteronuclear dipolar couplings and quadrupole couplings[21]. One of the commonly used solid-state NMR techniques is 2D PISEMA (Polarization Inversion and Spin Exchange at Magic Angle) spectroscopy that has been well utilized in obtaining dynamic structure and topology of membrane proteins embedded in lipid bilayers[22]. Here, we demonstrate the feasibility of 2D PISEMA experiment using magnetically-aligned macro-nanodiscs containing a 15N-labeled cytochrome b5 protein as an example. The 2D PISEMA spectrum shown in Figure 4H correlates 15N chemical shifts with 1H-15N dipolar couplings. Since cytochrome b5 consists of a rigid transmembrane helix and a mobile large soluble domain, the resonances observed in the PISEMA spectrum mostly appear from the rigid transmembrane domain while the resonances from the soluble domain of the protein are motionally averaged out. The helical geometry of the transmembrane helix of cytb5 gives rise to a characteristic ‘wheel’-like pattern of resonances in the 2D PISEMA spectrum. Simulation of the helical wheel pattern revealed that the transmembrane helix is tilted by 14.5±3° away from the lipid bilayer normal (Supporting Information Figure S10), which is in agreement with previous studies on magnetically-aligned bicelles.[23] These results demonstrate the feasibility of static solid-state NMR experiments to study membrane proteins reconstituted in macro-nanodiscs.

We also demonstrate the application of SMA-EA based nanodiscs for solution NMR studies on reconstituted membrane proteins. A 2D 1H-15N TROSY-HSQC (Transverse Relaxation Optimized SpectroscopY Heteronuclear Single Quantum Correlation)[24] NMR spectrum of 15N-labeled cytb5 is shown in Figure 4G. The high-resolution solution NMR spectrum indicates that the protein is well folded in agreement with a previous study[25] and therefore the application of well-developed multidimensional solution NMR techniques for high-resolution structural and dynamics studies are feasible using the SMA-EA polymer-based nanodiscs.

In conclusion, we have successfully overcome the difficulties in producing small molecular weight polymer based nanodiscs using a simple and inexpensive chemical reaction, and for the first time the polymer-based nanodiscs of varying size (10 to 50 nm) can be produced and used for reconstitution of a membrane protein for high-resolution structural studies by NMR spectroscopy. Our results are remarkable in that the SMA-EA-based macro-nanodiscs spontaneously align in an external magnetic field enabling the well-established solid-state NMR based structural and dynamics studies on membrane proteins, in addition to the commonly used multidimensional solution NMR experiments on SMA-EA nanodiscs[2] and MAS experiments[26] macro-nanodiscs. The reported experimental results provide valuable insights into the properties, structural assembly and mechanism of formation of nanodiscs. Therefore, we foresee that the ease with which various size SMA-EA nanodiscs/macro-nanodiscs are prepared would dramatically expand the applications of polymer-based nanodiscs in various fields including structural biology, biotechnology and biomedicine.

Supplementary Material

Supporting Information

NIHMS905354-supplement-Supporting_Information.pdf (2.8MB, pdf)

Supporting Information Video

Download video file (10.5MB, avi)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by NIH (GM084018 to A.R.). We thank Dr. Sang-Choul and Dr. Lucy Waskell for providing the plasmid and help with the preparation of cytochrome-b5.

Footnotes

Supporting information for this article is given via a link at the end of the document.

References

  • 1.Phillips R, Ursell T, Wiggins P, Sens P. Nature. 2009;459:379–385. doi: 10.1038/nature08147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nasr ML, Baptista D, Strauss M, Sun ZJ, Grigoriu S, Huser S, Pluckthun A, Hagn F, Walz T, Hogle JM, Wagner G. Nat Methods. 2017;14:49–52. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Denisov IG, Sligar SG. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2016;23:481–486. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.3195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Denisov IG, Sligar SG. Chem Rev. 2017;117:4669–4713. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bayburt TH, Grinkova YV, Sligar SG. Nano Lett. 2002;2:853–856. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bayburt TH, Grinkova YV, Sligar SG. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2006;450:215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hagn F, Etzkorn M, Raschle T, Wagner G. J Am Chem Soc. 2013;135:1919–1925. doi: 10.1021/ja310901f. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Zhang M, Huang R, Ackermann R, Im SC, Waskell L, Schwendeman A, Ramamoorthy A. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2016;128:4497–4499. doi: 10.1002/anie.201600073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Kondo H, Ikeda K, Nakano M. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2016;146:423–430. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.06.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Park SH, Berkamp S, Cook GA, Chan MK, Viadiu H, Opella SJ. Biochemistry. 2011;50:8983–5. doi: 10.1021/bi201289c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Orwick-Rydmark M, Lovett JE, Graziadei A, Lindholm L, Hicks MR, Watts A. Nano Lett. 2012;12:4687–4692. doi: 10.1021/nl3020395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Oluwole AO, Danielczak B, Meister A, Babalola JO, Vargas C, Keller S. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56:1919–1924. doi: 10.1002/anie.201610778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ritchie TK, Grinkova YV, Bayburt TH, Denisov IG, Zolnerciks JK, Atkins WM, Sligar SG. Methods in enzymol. 2009;464:211–231. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(09)64011-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Dorr JM, Koorengevel MC, Schafer M, Prokofyev AV, Scheidelaar S, van der Cruijsen EA, Dafforn TR, Baldus M, Killian JA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:18607–18612. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1416205112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee SC, Knowles TJ, Postis VL, Jamshad M, Parslow RA, Lin YP, Goldman A, Sridhar P, Overduin M, Muench SP, Dafforn TR. Nat Protoc. 2016;11:1149–1162. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Orwick MC, Judge PJ, Procek J, Lindholm L, Graziadei A, Engel A, Grobner G, Watts A. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2012;51:4653–4657. doi: 10.1002/anie.201201355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Dorr JM, Scheidelaar S, Koorengevel MC, Dominguez JJ, Schafer M, van Walree CA, Killian JA. Eur Biophys J. 2016;45:3–21. doi: 10.1007/s00249-015-1093-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bennett AE, Griffin RG, Ok JH, Vega S. J Chem Phys. 1992;96:8624–8627. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Scheidelaar S, Koorengevel MC, van Walree CA, Dominguez JJ, Dorr JM, Killian JA. Biophys J. 2016;111:1974–1986. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.09.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sanders CR, Prestegard JH. Biophys J. 1990;58:447–460. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82390-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Dürr UHN, Gildenberg M, Ramamoorthy A. Chem Rev. 2012;112:6054–6074. doi: 10.1021/cr300061w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Prosser RS, Hunt SA, DiNatale JA, Vold RR. J Am Chem Soc. 1996;118:269–270. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Prosser RS, Hwang JS, Vold RR. Biophys J. 1998;74:2405–2418. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(98)77949-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Sanders CR, Hare BJ, Howard KP, Prestegard JH. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 1994;26:421–444. [Google Scholar]; De Angelis AA, Nevzorov AA, Park SH, Howell SC, Mrse AA, Opella SJ. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:15340–15341. doi: 10.1021/ja045631y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Marassi FM, Opella SJ. J Magn Reson. 2000;144:150–155. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Wang J, Denny J, Tian C, Kim S, Mo Y, Kovacs F, Song Z, Nishimura K, Gan Z, Fu R, Quine JR, Cross TA. J Magn Reson. 2000;144:162–167. doi: 10.1006/jmre.2000.2037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wu CH, Ramamoorthy A, Opella SJ. High-Resolution Heteronuclear Dipolar Solid-State NMR Spectroscopy. J Magn Reson, Series A. 1994;109:270–272. [Google Scholar]; Ramamoorthy A, Wu CH, Opella SJ. J Magn Reson. 1999;140:131–140. doi: 10.1006/jmre.1999.1827. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Ramamoorthy A, Wei Y, Lee DK. Annu Rep NMR Spectrosc. 2004;52:1–52. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Durr UH, Yamamoto K, Im SC, Waskell L, Ramamoorthy J Am Chem Soc. 2007;128:6670–1. doi: 10.1021/ja069028m. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pervushin K, Riek R, Wider G, Wüthrich K. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94:12366–12371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.23.12366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Ahuja S, Jahr N, Im SC, Vivekanandan S, Popovych N, Le Clair SV, Huang R, Soong R, Xu J, Yamamoto K, Nanga RP, Bridges A, Waskell L, Ramamoorthy A. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:22080–22095. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.448225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Brown LS, Ladizhansky V. Protein Sci. 2015;24:1333–1346. doi: 10.1002/pro.2700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Wylie BJ, Bhate MP, McDermott AE. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111:185–190. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1319577110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Kaplan M, Pinto C, Houben K, Baldus M. Q Rev Biophys. 2016;49:e15. doi: 10.1017/S003358351600010X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supporting Information

NIHMS905354-supplement-Supporting_Information.pdf (2.8MB, pdf)

Supporting Information Video

Download video file (10.5MB, avi)

Bioinspired, size-tunable self-assembly of polymer-lipid bilayer nanodiscs (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Reed Wilderman

Last Updated:

Views: 5823

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 91% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Reed Wilderman

Birthday: 1992-06-14

Address: 998 Estell Village, Lake Oscarberg, SD 48713-6877

Phone: +21813267449721

Job: Technology Engineer

Hobby: Swimming, Do it yourself, Beekeeping, Lapidary, Cosplaying, Hiking, Graffiti

Introduction: My name is Reed Wilderman, I am a faithful, bright, lucky, adventurous, lively, rich, vast person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.